Market / Infrastructure
Infrastructure: Emerging Tailwinds

The infrastructure investing landscape is shifting, shaped by a combination of tailwinds and
headwinds. 

Share

Key Points

  • The rapid growth of AI and electrification has accelerated the demand for reliable power and grid modernization. At the same time, recent geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have highlighted the importance of supply chain resilience and energy security.
  • These dynamics underscore the growing need for critical energy infrastructure, as well as for the discipline and experience required to navigate constrained markets.
  • Regulatory and technological constraints, not just demand, are increasingly determining where infrastructure assets can be built and scaled.
A Shifting Landscape Fueled by Strong Demand

The infrastructure investing landscape is shifting, shaped by a combination of tailwinds and headwinds. One tailwind is strong demand for power from data infrastructure—including data centers, telecom towers and fiber networks. As a result, data-related assets have become a core focus of infrastructure investing.

AI has been a significant catalyst for the growth of data infrastructure, alongside other technological developments such as cloud computing and increased mobile usage. While AI is increasing the scale and intensity of activity across data infrastructure, it is also intensifying existing power and location limitations.

By 2030, global data center electricity demand is expected to reach nearly 1,000 terawatt-hours (TWh) under base-case scenarios, reflecting the rapid expansion of AI-driven workloads (see below). This also highlights the need to debottleneck the grid through continued investment in power generation, grid capacity and interconnection.

Image
Chart Showing Global Data Center Electricity Demand Is Accelerating Rapidly

There is no assurance that the events shown will occur, and actual outcomes may be significantly different than those shown here. These numbers serve as exploratory scenarios to inform technology and policy choices. It is crucial to consider the wide range of uncertainties, including the scale of AI adoption and the efficiency with which this additional service demand will be met.
High Growth: This case explores the impact of stronger AI adoption and increased global demand for digital services. Base Case: Despite the strong increase in growth, data center electricity demand growth is expected to account for less than 10% of global electricity demand growth between 2024 and 2030. High Efficiency: In this case, we assume that AI and digital services demand follows the same trajectory as in the base case. However, several efficiency strategies have been implemented to counterbalance the increased energy demand resulting from the higher adoption of digital technologies. Headwinds: In this case, service demand does not grow as fast as in other scenarios, and AI sees a slower uptake. 
Source: International Energy Agency (IEA), Energy and AI: World Energy Outlook Special Report, April 2025.

This electricity demand is driven primarily by AI workloads that fall into two broad categories (see below):

  1. Model training: Model training is the process of teaching a machine learning model to recognize patterns and identify relationships by exposing it to large datasets.1 This requires significant computing power and must be located in areas with sufficient energy availability.
  2. Real-time inference: Inference is the process in which a trained AI model generates new outputs by reasoning and making predictions based on new data.2 It requires low latency, meaning infrastructure must be located close to end users.
Image
Chart Showing AI Factory Workloads

Past performance is not a reliable indicator or guarantee of future results. There is no assurance that the events shown will occur, and actual outcomes may be significantly different than those shown here. A gigawatt is a unit of electric power equal to one billion watts. AI factories are large digital hubs that feature high-performance computing power, specialized hardware such as graphics processing units (GPUs), enormous storage capacity and cooling systems that all work together to train and deploy AI models. 
Source: Brookfield. As of August 2025.

These workload types help to highlight a broader dynamic: while strong demand is driving the need for new capacity, it does not necessarily determine where or how quickly that capacity can be delivered. Outcomes may increasingly depend on distinct power, location and connectivity requirements, underscoring the idea that constraints—not just demand—are becoming a defining factor in the development of data infrastructure.

Constraints and Obstacles

Data infrastructure operates as an integrated system, with performance primarily depending on access to power, location and network connectivity. Constraints in any one of those areas can limit the ability to deliver capacity, even when demand is strong.

AI workloads help illustrate this dynamic. Some of the power needed to drive AI can be located far from end users in large-scale campuses with abundant power. However, much of the demand remains tied to smaller facilities near end users. This creates a potential constraint: the ability to deliver power in the right place, at the right time. The workload requirements also serve as examples of headwinds for the growth and development of data infrastructure.

Potential constraints are not limited to AI. The ongoing expansion of mobile broadband coverage requires infrastructure to be able to handle increased data usage. Even with this demand, land permitting and interconnection constraints can lengthen infrastructure development timelines, while regulatory processes and labor shortages can delay projects and disrupt schedules.

Interestingly, obstacles vary across regions, reflecting their different stages of digital maturity (see below). In some markets, the priority is to continue to expand basic coverage. In others, rapid adoption is driving network densification and increasing demand for fiber and interconnection. More developed and highly penetrated markets are increasingly constrained by limits on power, land and network capacity.

Image
Table of Emerging Constraints and Potential Implications

Source: Brookfield. For illustrative purposes only.

Still, across all environments, we see a consistent underlying pattern: The ability to deliver infrastructure is shaped less by demand and more by the ability to overcome or remove structural constraints that can limit where infrastructure can be delivered, developed and expanded over time.

The Impact of Constraints

With the speed of AI advancement, infrastructure constraints have had several impacts across the value chain.3 For example, hyperscalers are prioritizing industrial equipment suppliers that can offer reliability, products that can meet specific technical and operational requirements, and punctual delivery. For their part, suppliers are shifting their operating models to focus on execution readiness and the ability to co-engineer products. Data center customers are favoring more modular, integrated equipment for power, cooling and control systems.

Key stakeholders across the AI value chain are becoming more selective about their inputs and long-term partners. In this environment, we believe that the investors that have the necessary capital, sourcing advantages and operating expertise may be better positioned to navigate power, connectivity and location constraints.

Bottom Line

In our view, data infrastructure offers a significant opportunity for investors, but it will take skill and expertise to access these opportunities. The next phase of data infrastructure investing will be defined not by who builds the most, but by who can consistently identify, secure and execute on the most constrained opportunities.

For investors, that will require access to scarce resources, such as power, land and interconnection, combined with business models that may offer revenue visibility and the ability to expand over time. And investors should seek partners who have global sourcing and origination channels across the infrastructure value chain, access to capital and the expertise to execute across a range of market environments.

Read More in our Alts Quarterly Q3 2026.

END NOTES

1. Kyle Aubrey, “What’s the Difference Between Deep Learning Training and Inference?” NVIDIA blog, July 29, 2016. Updated October 2025.

2. Aubrey, “What’s the Difference Between Deep Learning Training and Inference?”

3. Maria Goodpaster et al., “The $7 Trillion Data Center Buildout: How Industrials Can Capture Their Share,” McKinsey & Company, March 27, 2026.

A WORD ABOUT RISK

As an asset class, private credit comprises a large variety of different debt instruments. While each has its own risk and return profile, private credit assets generally have increased risk of default, due to their typical opportunistic focus on companies with limited funding options, in comparison with their public equivalents. Because private credit usually involves lending to below-investment-grade or non-rated issuers, yield on private credit assets is increased in return for taking on increased risk.

Investments in real estate-related instruments may be affected by economic, legal or environmental factors that affect property values, rents or occupancies of real estate.

Infrastructure companies may be subject to a variety of factors that may adversely affect their business, including high interest costs, high leverage, regulation costs, economic slowdowns, surplus capacity, increased competition, lack of fuel availability and energy conservation policies.

Alternative investments often are speculative and include a high degree of risk. Investors could lose all or a substantial amount of their investment. High-yield bonds are subject to interest-rate risk. When interest rates rise, bond prices fall; generally, the longer a bond’s maturity, the more sensitive it is to this risk. Yields are subject to change with economic conditions. Yield is only one factor that should be considered when making an investment decision.

Investment opportunities related to artificial intelligence and emerging technologies involve significant risks including rapid technological change, regulatory uncertainty, market speculation, and the possibility that anticipated technological advances may not materialize as expected. AI-focused investments may be highly volatile and speculative in nature. Forecasts regarding AI adoption, data center demand, electricity consumption, and related infrastructure development are inherently uncertain and may not develop as anticipated.

The information in this publication is not and is not intended as investment advice, an indication of trading intent or holdings, or a prediction of investment performance. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against loss. The views and information expressed herein are subject to change at any time. Brookfield disclaims any responsibility to update such views and/or information. This information is deemed to be from reliable sources; however, Brookfield does not warrant its completeness or accuracy.

The opinions expressed herein are the current opinions of Brookfield, including its subsidiaries and affiliates, and are subject to change without notice. Brookfield, including its subsidiaries and affiliates, assumes no responsibility to update such information or to notify clients of any changes. Any outlooks, forecasts or portfolio weightings presented herein are as of the date appearing on this material only and are also subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future performance, and the value of investments and the income derived from those investments can fluctuate.

Forward-Looking Statements

The information herein contains, includes or is based on forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, specifically Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements include all statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address future activities, events or developments, including, without limitation, business or investment strategy or measures to implement strategy, competitive strengths, goals, expansion and growth of our business, plans, prospects and references to our future success. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts.

Words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other similar words are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many such factors will be important in determining our actual future results or outcomes. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed.

Our actual results or outcomes may vary materially. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. They are not intended to provide an overview of the terms applicable to any products sponsored by Brookfield Corporation and its affiliates (together, “Brookfield”). Information and views are subject to change without notice. Some of the information provided herein has been prepared based on Brookfield’s internal research, and certain information is based on various assumptions made by Brookfield, any of which may prove to be incorrect. Brookfield may not have verified (and disclaims any obligation to verify) the accuracy or completeness of any information included herein, including information that has been provided by third parties, and you cannot rely on Brookfield as having verified any of the information. The information provided herein reflects Brookfield’s perspectives and beliefs as of the date of this commentary.

Index Provider Disclaimer

The quoted indexes within this publication are unmanaged and cannot be purchased directly by investors. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only and does not predict or depict the performance of any investment. There may be material factors relevant to any such comparison, such as differences in volatility and also regulatory and legal restrictions between the indexes shown and any investment in a Brookfield strategy, composite or fund. Brookfield obtained all index data from third-party index sponsors and believes the data to be accurate; however, Brookfield makes no representation regarding its accuracy.

Brookfield does not own or participate in the construction or day-to-day management of the indexes referenced in this document.

The index information provided is for your information only and does not imply or predict that a Brookfield product will achieve similar results. This information is subject to change without notice. The indexes referenced in this document do not reflect any fees, expenses, sales charges or taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. The index sponsors permit use of their indexes and related data on an “as is” basis, make no warranties regarding the same, do not guarantee the suitability, quality, accuracy, timeliness and/or completeness of their index or any data included in, related to or derived from it, and assume no liability in connection with the use of the foregoing. The index sponsors have no liability for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential or other damages (including loss of profits). The index sponsors do not sponsor, endorse or recommend Brookfield or any of its products or services. Unless otherwise noted, all indexes are total-return indexes.

Key Terms and Index Definitions

Annualized Net Return is the geometric mean of the returns with respect to one year. It represents periodic returns rescaled to a period of one year.

Bloomberg Global Aggregate Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index comprising globally traded investment-grade bonds. The index includes government securities, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and corporate securities to simulate the universe of bonds in the market. The maturities of the bonds in the index are more than one year.

Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index measures the USD-denominated, high yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market.

Capitalization Rate (Cap Rate) is a real estate return metric used to estimate a property’s value based on its income potential. It is calculated by dividing the property’s net operating income by the present-day value of the property as indicated by prevailing market rates.

Cliffwater Direct Lending Index (CDLI) seeks to measure the unlevered, gross-of-fee performance of U.S. middle-market corporate loans, as represented by the asset-weighted performance of the underlying assets of business development companies (BDCs), including both exchange-traded and unlisted BDCs, subject to certain eligibility requirements.

Direct Lending Yield is represented by current yield, calculated as the most recent quarter’s interest payments divided by average assets over the quarter.

Dry Powder refers to committed but uninvested capital that private fund managers have available for future investment opportunities.

Enterprise Value to Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EV/EBITDA) is a valuation metric that compares a company’s total enterprise value to its EBITDA and is commonly used to assess relative valuation across companies and transactions.

FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Real Estate Index is an unmanaged market-capitalization-weighted total-return index that consists of publicly traded equity REITs and listed property companies from developed markets.

Green Street Commercial Property Price Index (CPPI) is a time-series index published by Green Street, which tracks the value of U.S. commercial real estate properties. The index is based on transaction prices and appraisals of institutional-quality properties across major sectors, including office, industrial, retail and multifamily. It is widely used as a benchmark for changes in commercial property values over time.

ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index tracks the performance of USD-denominated below-investment-grade corporate debt publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market.

Industrial Production: Manufacturing: Durable Goods: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Index measures the real output of all relevant establishments located in the United States, regardless of their ownership, but not those located in U.S. territories. The Federal Reserve’s monthly index of industrial production and the related capacity indexes and capacity utilization rates cover manufacturing, mining, and electric and gas utilities.

MSCI World Index is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets.

NCREIF Property Index (NPI) is a quarterly, unleveraged composite total return for private commercial real estate properties held for investment purposes only. All properties in the NPI have been acquired, at least in part, on behalf of tax-exempt institutional investors and held in a fiduciary environment.

Net Asset Value (NAV): The per share value of a mutual fund, found by subtracting the fund’s liabilities from its assets and dividing by the number of shares outstanding.

NFI-ODCE Index is an index of investment returns (gross of fees) of the largest private real estate funds pursuing a core investment strategy, which is typically characterized by low risk, low leverage (less than 40%), and stable properties diversified across the U.S.

Preqin Infrastructure Index captures in an index the return earned by investors on average in their private infrastructure portfolios, based on the actual amount of money invested in private capital partnerships. Each data point is individually calculated from the pool of closed-end funds for which comprehensive performance data is held, as of both the start and end of the quarter.

Preqin Private Equity Index captures in an index the return earned by investors on average in their private equity portfolios, based on the actual amount of money invested in private capital partnerships. Each data point is individually calculated from the pool of closed-end funds for which comprehensive performance data is held, as of both the start and end of the quarter.

Preqin Real Estate Index captures in an index the return earned by investors on average in their private real estate portfolios, based on the actual amount of money invested in private capital partnerships. Each data point is individually calculated from the pool of closed-end funds for which comprehensive performance data is held, as of both the start and end of the quarter.

Recapitalization is the process of changing the mix of debt and equity in an investment’s capital structure to optimize financing. In private equity, this may involve exchanging debt for equity or vice versa, such as selling shares to pay down debt. In real estate, recapitalization often means bringing in new investors to adjust the debt-equity balance. The main goals are to improve financial structure, manage debt, restructure ownership, or enhance underperforming assets.

Secondary Pricing refers to the price at which existing interests in private funds are bought and sold in the secondary market, often expressed as a percentage of the underlying fund’s net asset value (NAV).

S&P 500 Index is a market-cap-weighted equity index of 500 widely held, large-capitalization U.S. companies.

© 2026 Brookfield

ID BPW979628